Comments on: High Court To Take Up Case Involving Part of Patriot Act

By: randy lee warren

randy lee warren — Wed, 11 May 2011 15:33:58 +0000

I have been interrigated by way of dissemination technologys that enter the pores and interstices in unabrided dictionarys this is being changed and Ive tried to get a attorney can,t find one FAX the US attorneys office and they wont barify my FAX . the justice department does return my messages,I had to go to court on a conspiracy case in kansas city mo I ask for warrentless surveillence relief and they said there wasnt a surveillence submitted warrentless isnt submitted,DUMBASS, the technology is a physical/mental link and dissemination collection systemsfalls under military weapon system.

By: Warren

Warren — Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:23:36 +0000

http://www.911missinglinks.com/

Just found info in Patriot Act
We think Michael Chertcoff (Dual Israeli/US citizen) wrote it, not John Ashcroft.

Inside the Patriot Act, a provision gives immunity to ANY Israeli against litigation related to 9/11

If the public knew this, there would be an uprising against the Act….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Osp1873RdPg

http://www.facebook.com/conspiracywatchdog

By: lida shafaghat

lida shafaghat — Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:05:26 +0000

I am insisting in what I asked before ; deleting all my comments related to this problem . I am just an ordinary person .
Thanks

By: Lida shafaghat

Lida shafaghat — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:03:31 +0000

I would be grateful if you would kindly omit all my commments from the beginning up to this messsage . I didn’t mean my messages became public and my name linked to this information . I have nothing to do with .
Thank you very much in advance .

By: Lida Shafaghat

Lida Shafaghat — Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:35:41 +0000

I AM NOT AMERICAN . I HAVE NEVER BEEN IN THE UNITED STATES. i HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH POLITICS. BY THE WAY THIS ARTCLE IS TOO DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND FOR ME . IT SEEMS TO BE A SET UP TO HIDE SOMETHING. wHAT IS IT ALL ABOUT ? iS IT TO PUT DEVICES INSIDE PEOPLE’S BODY TO FORCE THEM OR TO STEAL INFORMATION FROM THEM , THIS COSTING THEIR HEALTH AND THEIR LIFE .THEN LABLING THEM AS TERRORIST BECAUSE OF HAVING FLIED BY AN IRANIAN AIRLINE ONCE ;LIKE MANY OTHERS , WITH THE OBLIGATORY EYE PRINT WHILE I HAD COME BY MY OWN EXPENSES ( MY LITTLE BUDGET ) FOR SCIENTIFIC INTEREST ALONGSIDE TO EVALUATE MY CHANCES FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDIES in U.S BY ASKING A SIMPLE QUESTION FROM the chief academic officer or a high profile intensivist . I AM NOT INTERESTED AT ALL ANYMORE to study in United states , YES I ALWAYS CONSIDER AUSTRALIA THE CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN HEARING RESEARCH AND A SPECIAL INSTITUTE THE CENTER OF EARTH IN THE FIELD , IF THIS HAS BOTHERED HARVARD OR ANY OTHER AMERICAN INSTITUTION , I AM SORRY FOR THEIR NARROW VISION .THIS IS THE TRUTH NOBODY CAN DENY , INTELLIGENCE AND KNOWLEDGE COMES FIRST , MONEY IS THE SECOND , IT IS JUST A TOOL. The conferences in dubai WERE MEDICAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCES . WEREN’T THEY ? FINALLY WHO HAS TORTURED ME AND HAS DEPRIVED ME OF MEDICAL CARE , THIS IS A HUGE CRIME , YOU KNOW ? BE CLEAR AND HONEST . i AM A WOMAN , NOT A MAN , i AM NOT OBESE , i AM A BEAUTIFUL MIDDLE -AGED LADY WHO HAS HAD A DIFFICULT LIFE AND NATURALLY LIKES TO FURTHER HER EDUCATION . i DESREVED MORE BUT i WAS DOING MY BEST AND WAS REMARKABLE WITHIN THE SITUATION I HAD GONE THROUGH . WHAT IS THE REALITY BEHIND ? i AM SICK OF THIS CONSPIRACY . THIS PAGE IS PART OF IT AS I UNDERSTAND . STOP IT . I NEED MEDICAL CARE AND THE DAMGES HAS TO BE COMPENSTAED . ALL IS REVEALED ENOUGH . NOBODY CAN DENY . GET AWAY FROM ME . I HAVE ALWAYS LIKED A CALM BEAUTIFUL SCIENTIFIC LIFE.

By: Donald F. Truax

Donald F. Truax — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:21:27 +0000

All

The ACLU has compiled a report concerning this:

http://www.aclu.org/pdfs/safefree/patriot_report_20090310.pdf

What You Should Know

Despite the many amendments to these laws since 9/11, congress and the public have yet to receive real information about how these powerful tools are being used to collect information on Americans and how that information is being used. All of these laws work together to create a surveillance superstructure – and Congress must understand how it really works to create meaningful protections for civil liberties.

The ACLU’s recent report, Reclaiming Patriotism, provides more information on parts of the Patriot Act that need to be amended.

National Security Letters (NSLs). The FBI uses NSLs to compel internet service providers, libraries, banks, and credit reporting companies to turn over sensitive information about their customers and patrons. Using this data, the government can compile vast dossiers about innocent people. Government reports confirm that upwards of 50,000 of these secret record demands go out each year. In response to an ACLU lawsuit (Doe v. Holder), the Second Circuit Court of Appeal struck down as unconstitutional the part of the NSL law that gives the FBI the power to prohibit NSL recipients from telling anyone that the government has secretly requested customer Internet records.

Material Support Statute. This provision criminalizes providing “material support” to terrorists, defined as providing any tangible or intangible good, service or advice to a terrorist or designated group. As amended by the Patriot Act and other laws since September 11, this section criminalizes a wide array of activities, regardless of whether they actually or intentionally further terrorist goals or organizations. Federal courts have struck portions of the statute as unconstitutional and a number of cases have been dismissed or ended in mistrial.

FISA Amendments Act of 2008. This past summer, Congress passed a law to permit the government to conduct warrantless and suspicion-less dragnet collection of U.S. residents’ international telephone calls and e-mails. This too must be amended to provide meaningful privacy protections and judicial oversight of the government’s intrusive surveillance power.

This is an important issue we all need to pay close attention to.

(((3)))