<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey Rep. Boehner! I&#8217;m An American, And I Support A Public Option</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=boehner-american-support-public-option</link>
	<description>Intrepid New Journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:04:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John W Ross</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1460</link>
		<dc:creator>John W Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 01:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1460</guid>
		<description>To those of you who think the &quot;Public Option&quot; is good.--You do not understand that the public option will bankrupt the country more than it already is. This health care bill CANNOT be paid for. It is being done for control over the American people and that is all. Taxes will keep going up with the presently proposed H care. --There will never be free health care for all. The only thing that will work is free competiion across state lines.--All people should read the Heritage.com web site and receive the truth about this. Obama is nothing but a Facist. Read a good history book and you will find out where we are headed. Ask countries where they have Socialist H care. Our system in America is the best in the world. Compettion across State lines and Tort reform is the only way to go.--Insurance companies only profit about 2-3 percent. --- Honestly consider what Heritage has to say before passing judgement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those of you who think the &#8220;Public Option&#8221; is good.&#8211;You do not understand that the public option will bankrupt the country more than it already is. This health care bill CANNOT be paid for. It is being done for control over the American people and that is all. Taxes will keep going up with the presently proposed H care. &#8211;There will never be free health care for all. The only thing that will work is free competiion across state lines.&#8211;All people should read the Heritage.com web site and receive the truth about this. Obama is nothing but a Facist. Read a good history book and you will find out where we are headed. Ask countries where they have Socialist H care. Our system in America is the best in the world. Compettion across State lines and Tort reform is the only way to go.&#8211;Insurance companies only profit about 2-3 percent. &#8212; Honestly consider what Heritage has to say before passing judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dobropet</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>dobropet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 21:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>Where are the statistics showing that (a) denying coverage for pre-existing conditions is based solely by profit-seeking private insurance and not any other mechanism the government has already placed upon these insurers, or the policy being implemented by way of the government. (b) unfairly denying coverage for valid claims by policyholders as a way of reducing their outlays because of government restrictions upon the market which remove the profits of government officials when coverage is accepted. (c) cancelling policies of customers who start costing them too much when they fall ill when government protections disallow private insurers the profits they seek due to revenue losses on the government side:


&quot;Obama assures us that this is not government-run healthcare, that this is not a single-payer system, that the only consequence to these reforms is that healthcare will cost less and that anybody who denies this is misleading or does not understand the facts. Without his reform, he insists, costs will grow unsustainably, which will threaten reimbursements and the stability of the healthcare system.

Unfortunately, since Obama uses faulty logic to diagnose the problem, his solutions will only make matters worse faster. The correct framework within which to diagnose the problem is to admit that costs are out of control because they do not reflect prices created by the voluntary exchange between patients and providers, between customers and producers, like every well-functioning industry.       -Gabriel E. Vidal&quot;

:to expand upon this broken system through circumventing of the previous model nothing can be attained which benefits society in such that the former model had been any more successful.

http://mises.org/story/3543
http://mises.org/story/3428</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are the statistics showing that (a) denying coverage for pre-existing conditions is based solely by profit-seeking private insurance and not any other mechanism the government has already placed upon these insurers, or the policy being implemented by way of the government. (b) unfairly denying coverage for valid claims by policyholders as a way of reducing their outlays because of government restrictions upon the market which remove the profits of government officials when coverage is accepted. (c) cancelling policies of customers who start costing them too much when they fall ill when government protections disallow private insurers the profits they seek due to revenue losses on the government side:</p>
<p>&#8220;Obama assures us that this is not government-run healthcare, that this is not a single-payer system, that the only consequence to these reforms is that healthcare will cost less and that anybody who denies this is misleading or does not understand the facts. Without his reform, he insists, costs will grow unsustainably, which will threaten reimbursements and the stability of the healthcare system.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, since Obama uses faulty logic to diagnose the problem, his solutions will only make matters worse faster. The correct framework within which to diagnose the problem is to admit that costs are out of control because they do not reflect prices created by the voluntary exchange between patients and providers, between customers and producers, like every well-functioning industry.       -Gabriel E. Vidal&#8221;</p>
<p>:to expand upon this broken system through circumventing of the previous model nothing can be attained which benefits society in such that the former model had been any more successful.</p>
<p><a href="http://mises.org/story/3543" rel="nofollow">http://mises.org/story/3543</a><br />
<a href="http://mises.org/story/3428" rel="nofollow">http://mises.org/story/3428</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redsnow</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>redsnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>If you already have insurance, there&#039;s no reason at all for you to take out a second policy. But for people who are unemployed, unemployable, or whose employer does not offer health insurance, a public plan could provide them with adequate health insurance at affordable rates. That&#039;s what I&#039;m hoping for, anyway!

Private enterprise is a powerful and useful force in society, and indeed it is the basis of the American economy, and almost every other country&#039;s economy. However it isn&#039;t the one-size-fits-all answer to every question.  In the case of health insurance, the problems arising from profit-seeking private corporations include (a) denying coverage for pre-existing conditions, (b) unfairly denying coverage for valid claims by policyholders as a way of reducing their outlays (c) cancelling policies of customers who start costing them too much when they fall ill.  I am strongly hoping that a public plan option, along with the rest of the reforms, will help us to address these problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you already have insurance, there&#8217;s no reason at all for you to take out a second policy. But for people who are unemployed, unemployable, or whose employer does not offer health insurance, a public plan could provide them with adequate health insurance at affordable rates. That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m hoping for, anyway!</p>
<p>Private enterprise is a powerful and useful force in society, and indeed it is the basis of the American economy, and almost every other country&#8217;s economy. However it isn&#8217;t the one-size-fits-all answer to every question.  In the case of health insurance, the problems arising from profit-seeking private corporations include (a) denying coverage for pre-existing conditions, (b) unfairly denying coverage for valid claims by policyholders as a way of reducing their outlays (c) cancelling policies of customers who start costing them too much when they fall ill.  I am strongly hoping that a public plan option, along with the rest of the reforms, will help us to address these problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dobropet</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1309</link>
		<dc:creator>dobropet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1309</guid>
		<description>I already have insurance. Why would I need to pay for another insurance plan?

And how did you come about the &quot;profit-seeking private plans&quot; lingo? Isn&#039;t that what private enterprise is supposed to be about? Is this not a profit driven economy?

Invest? Isn&#039;t that what the I.R.S. does, and yet to date I have not seen any indication of how my tax dollars were spent or used to help fund this bureacracy. From my view, taxes are used to fund programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, correct? The only possible way this reform would get funding is through taxation. Government has no weatlh, the federal reserve does. If those programs are not enough for the people who use them how will more taxation solve an already exacerbated problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already have insurance. Why would I need to pay for another insurance plan?</p>
<p>And how did you come about the &#8220;profit-seeking private plans&#8221; lingo? Isn&#8217;t that what private enterprise is supposed to be about? Is this not a profit driven economy?</p>
<p>Invest? Isn&#8217;t that what the I.R.S. does, and yet to date I have not seen any indication of how my tax dollars were spent or used to help fund this bureacracy. From my view, taxes are used to fund programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, correct? The only possible way this reform would get funding is through taxation. Government has no weatlh, the federal reserve does. If those programs are not enough for the people who use them how will more taxation solve an already exacerbated problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redsnow</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>redsnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>Not taxes, but people like you and me paying insurance premiums into an insurance plan and then claiming for covered healthcare expenses when necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not taxes, but people like you and me paying insurance premiums into an insurance plan and then claiming for covered healthcare expenses when necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dobropet</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>dobropet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>i.e., taxes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i.e., taxes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redsnow</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>redsnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 13:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>dobropet, it will be funded just like any other kind of insurance: a large pool of people will pay insurance premiums into the fund, which will invest the money. Claims will be paid from the fund.  The public plan will likely also use some of its money to purchase re-insurance i.e. it can even insure itself against major losses.  This has the effect of putting all the separate plan pools into a few much larger pools to spread the risk.

The major reason for having a public plan option will be to create an alternative to the profit-seeking private plans so it can run on somewhat different rules as decided by the government, hopefully for the greater good of the people!  Covering pre-existing conditions, not cutting off care from individuals when their medical bills become too great, spending less of its revenue on advertising and huge executive compensations and more on people&#039;s health care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dobropet, it will be funded just like any other kind of insurance: a large pool of people will pay insurance premiums into the fund, which will invest the money. Claims will be paid from the fund.  The public plan will likely also use some of its money to purchase re-insurance i.e. it can even insure itself against major losses.  This has the effect of putting all the separate plan pools into a few much larger pools to spread the risk.</p>
<p>The major reason for having a public plan option will be to create an alternative to the profit-seeking private plans so it can run on somewhat different rules as decided by the government, hopefully for the greater good of the people!  Covering pre-existing conditions, not cutting off care from individuals when their medical bills become too great, spending less of its revenue on advertising and huge executive compensations and more on people&#8217;s health care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dobropet</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1296</link>
		<dc:creator>dobropet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1296</guid>
		<description>The &quot;public option&quot;, how will this be funded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;public option&#8221;, how will this be funded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starryann2000</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>starryann2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 13:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1295</guid>
		<description>what happened to good old fashioned common sense instead of trying to throw everything out  why don&#039;t they just fix the part that is wrong and leave what works.  How about if they made a college education free so doctors didn&#039;t  have to pay so much to become doctors, how about getting drug costs down and  frivolous lawsuits, and  building costs if they did all this maybe doctors could afford to charge less. lots of questions but one&#039;s that need asking.  If they get a public option how much red tape will people have to go through to get it  and how many will fall through the cracks, they already have Medicaid which covers some but they have problems with that even.  You can bet if government gets involved in anything it won&#039;t come out the way they say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what happened to good old fashioned common sense instead of trying to throw everything out  why don&#8217;t they just fix the part that is wrong and leave what works.  How about if they made a college education free so doctors didn&#8217;t  have to pay so much to become doctors, how about getting drug costs down and  frivolous lawsuits, and  building costs if they did all this maybe doctors could afford to charge less. lots of questions but one&#8217;s that need asking.  If they get a public option how much red tape will people have to go through to get it  and how many will fall through the cracks, they already have Medicaid which covers some but they have problems with that even.  You can bet if government gets involved in anything it won&#8217;t come out the way they say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: starryann2000</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5694/boehner-american-support-public-option/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>starryann2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=5694#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>To get a good feel for the issue you bring up and all others check out  C-Span it is a real eye opener as you are listening directly to the debate, you are right in the senate or congress and can here all that is happening. another good place to check out is open secrets.org they are a non profit watch dog group and they have a listing of  all the senators and congressmen who get lobbyists money and wouldn&#039;t  you know that  Backus and many others are getting lobbyist money from the health care industry  talk about conflict of interest.   Hope many of you guys will check this out as will give you another perspective  as my teacher used to say nothing in life is free and in the end whatever they do we will be the one&#039;s who pay for it one way or another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To get a good feel for the issue you bring up and all others check out  C-Span it is a real eye opener as you are listening directly to the debate, you are right in the senate or congress and can here all that is happening. another good place to check out is open secrets.org they are a non profit watch dog group and they have a listing of  all the senators and congressmen who get lobbyists money and wouldn&#8217;t  you know that  Backus and many others are getting lobbyist money from the health care industry  talk about conflict of interest.   Hope many of you guys will check this out as will give you another perspective  as my teacher used to say nothing in life is free and in the end whatever they do we will be the one&#8217;s who pay for it one way or another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
