Nation

The Fight to Keep Single-Payer Healthcare Alive

single-payerThe people started lining up an hour early in Aurora, Illinois, 40 miles west of Chicago and not a hotbed of radical socialism, to hear Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, talk about HR 676, the single payer bill he co-authored with Rep. John Conyers, D-Michigan.

“Hastert Country” recently turned blue with the election of Democrat Bill Foster, but conservative ideas still dominate. But people want to know about healthcare.

Two fiftyish white women said their pastor told them to attend. Another woman stood on the edge and left, telling one organizer, “I think you are really on the wrong track” and others discussed their viewpoints in small knots in the hallway.

It was a real grassroots event with details coming together at the last minute and the speakers’ list growing as Rep. Mary Flowers and Rep. Mike Boland, two primary sponsors of Illinois single payer bill HB311, joined single-payer speakers, antiwar activists, representatives of labor and Greens.

What drew them together was the belief that single payer was the answer, and the desire to hear Kucinich, co-author of the single-payer bill that would make healthcare available to all at a huge cost savings because one-third of every healthcare dollar going to insurance companies for administration and profits would go to healthcare.

The bill currently has 86 sponsors. Kucinich believes that the time for HR 676 is coming and that the movement has to build nationally and state by state.

Kucinich told the 300-plus crowd, “Let me be clear, I am not here in support of HR 3200,” the primary House health-reform bill sponsored by Rep. John Dingell, D-Michigan, “because it keeps insurance companies in the game.”

Kucinich said that when he and Conyers wrote the single-payer bill they viewed healthcare for all as the next civil rights struggle. Of all aspects of HR 3200, Kucinich was most positive about his amendment which allows states to pass single-payer legislation.

“If we make enough noise about this amendment, they’ll keep it in,” he said.

One 14-year-old student from Aurora heading to the Illinois Math and Science Academy next year asked “Can you explain the co-ops? Some say co-ops, I say cop-out, but no one’s explaining them.”

[Some Democrats, such as Sen. Kent Conrad, D-North Dakota, have suggested creating health-care cooperatives – rather than a “public option” – as a way to attract Republican support for the bill. However, budget analysts see little or no cost savings from the co-ops over private insurance companies, unlike the public option that could achieve some savings by piggybacking administrative costs on the existing Medicare system and by putting competitive pressures on the private insurers.]

A lively question and answer session followed Kucinich’s speech.

When asked about the vote on HR676 he urged caution. “They will use the vote to rationalize their own bill.” He pointed out the House leadership will likely order the vote very early, with no hearings, no discussion, and no mark-up.

In Illinois the single-payer movement appears to be building momentum. Organizations are networking and connecting to lobby more effectively. The meeting provided a place for single-payer advocates to coordinate and more importantly bring new groups on board in a new coalition.

Single-payer groups, Democrats, Greens, antiwar groups and Kucinich met to strategize how to make Illinois the first single-payer state.

“A local single-payer movement cannot be controlled by the media,” said Kucinich in a discussion of single-payer strategy. “This will change the politics of your state, and Illinois can lead the nation.”

California has passed single payer twice and Governor Schwarzenegger has vetoed it twice.

With social services being cut to the bone in Illinois, and line items like domestic violence counseling and shelter, mental health counseling, Head Start, and services for people with disabilities being zeroed out or severely cut by Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn, the savings and relief single payer could bring can’t happen fast enough for many.

This report was originally published at afterdowningstreet.org

Sioban Kolar is co-coordinator for Chicago’s West Suburban Faith Based Peace Coalition.

Article Tools:  Print   Email

4 Responses for “The Fight to Keep Single-Payer Healthcare Alive”

  1. Angela says:

    I’m glad to see the single payer option still in play. If the Republicans have made the Public Option sound so complicated that people can’t understand it, then they have boxed themselves into the corner of finding a VERY SIMPLE answer that people CAN understand, right? There isn’t anything simpler than the single payer option. I say it’s time to take this fight out of the hands of the illusion of bi-partisanship which has led to nothing but lies, fear-mongering, and yet even more 2000 election-style Republican strong-arm tactics and put it where it belongs – in the true interest of the people – a single payer system that covers everyone equally!

    If everyone is equal under the law, then everyone should be equal under the eyes of the health care system. Our Constitution is such a miraculous document because it has been flexible enough to change with the changing times. The definition of what constitutes civilized society has changed since its passage. Remember that even education was once not considered a government-sponsored right in this country. Yet, it has been one of the building blocks that has made our country great. We are the last industrialized country to accept that health care is inextricably bound up in the ‘right to life’ as we know it at this point in our history. Now is the time to deliver on the recognition our Founding Father’s made to each citizen of those inalienable rights as they have been recognized through the changing centuries!

  2. william says:

    While single-payer would be the best, I do not know if the ignorance shown by so many can be overcome. Even a robust public-option could at least in theory help create true competition, though the propaganda war against either 676 or 3200 seems to be creating the wall that they backers of big insurance wanted.

    History is written by the victors, and legislature is passed by those with the most lobbyists. Sad but true.

  3. Jody says:

    This just sounds wonderful. You forgot an important aspect. Your freedom. “Everyone is equal under the law.” Where do you live? Are you in reality at all? Just remember, freedom is not what you want to loose. I wonder if people even know what the word means. Don’t even want to start about our education system.

  4. Anthony J Jordan says:

    It’s time to draw that “line in the sand”: Single Payer / Public Option / Veto. We don’t need and can’t afford any more giveaways to the insurance companies and pharmaceuticals.

Leave a Reply

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free

Article Tools:  Print   Email
Copyright © 2008 The Public Record. All rights reserved. Branding services provided by www.AndrewToschi.com Quantcast