Special to The Public Record

Change And The Chosen Path

obama-changeAuthor’s note: This article was written several days before President Obama’s escalation speech at West Point, when it was first leaked that 30,000-plus troops would be bound for Afghanistan.  I offer this as argument that in less than a year, the Obama presidency is a failure, by his own campaign’s definition.  I do so in the hopes of being presented an argument that convincingly counters the evidence of Obama’s policy trajectories presented here.  And, as you will see, Sotomayor and the stimulus bill do not serve a sufficient counterweight to the general body of policy the Obama Administration has so far evinced.

The psychology of previous investment proscribes humans from responding rationally when conditions warrant or even demand.  If the investment has been heavy enough, the psychology behind the investment will insist that people hold on to it, no matter how badly the investment may tank.  This occurs at all scales.  The American public’s investment in Barack Obama is tanking badly.  The question at this point becomes, how much longer can the policy trend lines continue before the body of his political support collapses altogether?

***

President Obama has failed his mandate.

It’s not a happy thing to have to say.  Many won’t agree, desperately fending off the obvious. The campaign sloganeering, well, it turned out to be just that.  All the worse that so many had hoped otherwise. Obama has been embarrassingly supine in dealing with the know-nothings. The end game of which is what, exactly?  Republicans will suddenly — one day — apprehend their misbegotten ways and cuddle the furry kitten? The GOP and their agents continue the attacks, the lies, the filibusters — a well funded font of rancorous, racist, rancid bullshit.  Palin-Beck in 2012!  That’s the ticket.

The last straw was escalation in Afghanistan.  And didn’t he ever drag out the process of doing what the military told him he should do weeks ago?  Perhaps that was suppose to make him look steely-eyed and circumspect.  One wonders what the point of all this review was meant to reveal when the end product is to tap almost all the troops McChrystal wanted in the first place.  In fact, we almost suspect that McChrystal may have high-balled his numbers as a negotiation entry point.  Then again, maybe not.  Because McChrystal knows he is dealing with a Democrat, one who seems especially smitten with getting along.  Which meant, of course, that Obama would meet McChrystal’s opening bid, with the necessary appearance of due diligence of course, because, well, that’s how Democrats roll.  They are the party of looking like they’re for “the people.”  The “review” at this point looks like mere window dressing.  Whether it was or was not is unimportant.  Certainly, it is unimportant to those on the ground.

If this does go down with plus-30,000 troops, Obama can kiss it goodbye.  Here is the short of it.  One way or another, Afghanistan will be the doom of Obama.  Withdrawal is conventionally seen as political suicide. It matters not that the American and Afghan public would like to see this happen.  Obama will be “ravaged” by foes in Washington.  Just like LBJ fretted.  Once Afghanistan turns more deeply unpopular — more than now — political forces will then turn that against Obama, and it will become his Vietnam.  If this escalation is a cave to military pressure and political considerations (and really, what else could it be?), then Obama may think he is staving off a near term political hit.  In reality, he is only delaying political doom.  And worse, he is consigning to their deaths, who knows how many more thousands, ravaging the land and the lives of millions more.

Tellingly, the left are squabbling about whether Obama is worse than Bush.  Indeed, when one finds oneself in a position of defending any president by trying to demonstrate that they are “not worse than Bush,” or even mentioning, in a subjunctive clause, that Obama is not “worse than Bush,” the admission is plain: failure.

***
Obama has pathetically caved to most every Republican yowl on every domestic bill, only to watch no Republicans even vote for the butchered bill anyway.  The health care botch will be the same [see below].

Obama demands Israel halt building on the West Bank, only to watch Israel approve more building on the West Bank.

Obama shamefully and shamelessly pulled a complete one-eighty on the odious FISA amendment.  To his great pleasure now, as he only balloons the already expansive surveillance state [see below].  On the plus side, he did this before he was president.

Obama has adopted all Bush era legal positions and then some — even asserting sovereign immunity — in warrentless wiretap lawsuits and beyond.

Obama has quietly backed renewal of the worst of the PATRIOT Act provisions, and doing so over the objections of fellow Democrats.

Obama has only escalated, atrociously so given his “Si, se puede” campaign, immigration raids and harassment across the country, the American Apparel episode especially mean-spirited in a time of brutal recession.  Only recently, a janitorial company “quietly let go” many illegal immigrants, a move that is part of an Obama administration plan to  “thin the ranks of illegal immigrants by going after the companies that hire them.”  Now, there’s a plan.  All those homeless nurses and accountants piling up in LA tent cities can go work as janitors now that the illegals have been purged.

Obama has continued to assert the power to conduct extraordinary renditions, or, as the Italian court that convicted 23 Americans (22 CIA) of just such an operation called it, “kidnappings”.

Obama has continued to assert the power to hold detainees indefinitely, without charge.  Apparently, he intends to do so.

Obama has continued to assert the power to conduct military tribunals in lieu of trial.  Apparently, he intends to do so.

Obama has continued to assert the power to spy on Americans.  Apparently, he intends to do so. With sovereign immunity.

Obama has continued to assert the power to torture and abuse detainees secretly, specifically within the confines of US SOC base at Bagram, and a similar facility at Balad Air Base in Iraq.

Obama has adopted a position on the Guantanamo detainees so arbitrarily pendulous, it makes Bush look like a model of sober reason: no trials for anyone. Say what you will about that, but it is consistent.  Obama’s “position” is no position at all.  He’s all over the map.  Particle and wave.  “Whatever works.”  Yes, he really is a Democrat.

Obama will fail to close Guantanamo Bay as a detainee prison by his own deadline and admission.  Obama fired the man who was trying to close it according to Obama’s own agenda [see below].  I predict this may go on for years, as Obama attempts to keep the GOP from swatting him on the issue.  And once again, petty domestic politics drive policy.

Obama has overseen the worsening of conditions at Guantanamo Bay.

Obama has upped the US military footprint in South America by bumping up military presence in Colombia, with the lapdog enthusiasm of a visibly excited Uribe on full display.  Pissing off everyone else, of course, but no matter.  Tensions are bound to escalate beyond those already on the rise.

Obama displayed an unaccountable hypocrisy and equivocation regarding the Honduran coup, even as his administration railed against Tehran for election rigging.  Of course, the one-way outrage is not unaccountable at all, and certainly not when one’s own military base is quietly involved.

Obama has continued to embrace long standing US-resistance to treaties banning landmines and other passive, deadly weapons, weapons that kill thousands of children every year.  This, even as the world observed the 20 year anniversary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, the passing of which was notable only for the sole company the United States keeps in refusing ratification of that treaty: Somalia.

Obama has deployed private mercenaries in Somalia.

Obama has only continued the escalation of the Pentagon budget, and emergency off-the-books contingency funds.

Obama has more currently deployed troops in Iraq and Afghanistan than Bush ever did.  And he is about to up that unhappy fact in Afghanistan again.  Certainly, we will be assured there will be a timeline for withdrawal. And certainly, it will be a sham.

Obama is expanding the US “Embassy” in Islamabad to behemoth proportions, in keeping with the model presented to the world in Baghdad.  Pakistanis are fuming at this project, viewing it rightly as a “military and intelligence command outpost.”

Obama has promoted, rather than denounced and fired, the commander of JSOC, which oversaw extreme abuse and torture of detainees.  Under McChrstyal’s command, many subordinates were convicted of such crimes.  No one above of the rank of major was convicted, despite “the documented role of more senior officers and civilian officials in authorizing and then covering up these crimes.”

Obama intends that the “withdrawal” from Iraq will be as every bit as farcical as has always been planned.  Major permanent military bases (and a billion dollar embassy) holding 50-60,000 troops, scattered hither and pointedly yon.  Oil contracts are in the works.

Obama is escalating a global missile defense shield, first actively begun by Reagan, mandated by the 1992 Defense Planning Guidance and then later by the plowed under Project for the New American Century.  The putative suspension of the installations in Poland and Czech Republic was a technical ruse.  There will be missiles and radar in those places, and elsewhere, such Romania and Bulgaria.  Plans are afoot for footprints in Georgia, Azerbaijan and beyond the Caspian.

Obama has escalated pipeline negotiations throughout Central Asia.  This may not sound bad.  Did I mention that Blackwater and JSOC are conducting military operations in Uzbekistan?  No? Not yet?  [see below.]

Obama has escalated the drone war “dramatically” in Pakistan.  Blackwater appears to be fully involved.  Of course, the whole damned debacle is illegal, but no matter.

Obama continues to embrace the employment of Blackwater, which is roaming wild in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan, and elsewhere.  Yes, Uzbekistan. In addition to planning drone strikes and operations against suspected Al Qaeda and Taliban forces in Pakistan for both JSOC and the CIA, the Blackwater team in Karachi also helps plan missions for JSOC inside Uzbekistan against the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan

“That piqued my curiosity and really worries me because I don’t know if you noticed but I was never told we are at war with Uzbekistan,” he said. “So, did I miss something, did Rumsfeld come back into power?” Obama has overseen a skyrocketing forty percent increase in private contractors in Afghanistan between June and September of this year.  There is some change here: no other president has overseen a war employing more private contractor personnel than Obama.  Private contractor personnel now comprise fifty-seven percent of all US personnel in Afghanistan.

Obama has coddled Wall Street beyond anyone’s wildest fears.  He has said not a word that I can discern about the bailout sham.  Is he sad that the Wall Street brethren who dumped vast sums on his meteoric rise to the White House behaved so badly before, during, and after the bailout? His administration is more vested with Wall Street chums than the Bush White House.  A ghastly embarrassment.

Obama got needlessly shabby on Greg Craig.  Another embarrassment.  A gross performance and easily as bad as anything Bush ever did.  But worse, because Craig was pushing Obama’s own agenda and got burned because Obama discovered some scary things that make that ol’ Constitution just as silly as Bush and Cheney always said it was.

Obama is watching key supporteres flee his administration, either forcibly or by choice: personal matters.

Obama is pushing the Congressional Black Caucus and the GOP together in refusing to address the concerns of the CBC regarding financial reform.  “Waters suggested the CBC’s 43 members could vote with the GOP to scuttle a variety of Democratic bills if Obama and Emanuel don’t address what she thinks is a lack of understanding of the CBC’s wide-ranging goals of reducing urban unemployment, home foreclosures and bank failures.” Obama continues to ignore the Don Siegelman miscarriage, and leaves Bush/Rove DoJ hacks in situ in Alabama.  Siegelman claims that there has  been  “no substantial change in the heart of the Department of Justice from the Bush-Rove Department of Justice.”  The judge who oversaw the travesty, Mark Fuller, is friends with all the DoJ Rovian Canarys, and had a personal grudge against Siegleman.  Fuller is in ownership of a defense contracting company that fuels Air Force One.

Obama stood back on health care reform and watched the carnage from the sidelines.  He stood nowhere, for nothing.  Congress made a hash of it, as is their wont.  Who knows what it will actually do, but it will get tens of millions of new customers for the insurance companies.  In all likelihood, the bill will wind up being a shameless corporate crap shoot, without the snake eyes.  The man who once said single payer was the obvious solution, sat on his hands while a vestigial public option was ravage further, and pernicious C Street amendments popped up like ulcerous sores.  Not a word.  He’ll sign anything at this point.

Obama has ramped up the secret surveillance state beyond mortal reckoning.  There are estimates, of course, wherein numbers drop into the $50-100 Billion* bin. Under Obama, the NSA is building a giant secret facility in Utah that will house a Yottabyte archive.  Surveillance state “Fusion Centers” are spreading like wildfire.

Obama has thrown out a trail balloon about cutting NASA’s budget.  Yes, let’s cut that one half of one percent of the federal budget that goes to that wastrel NASA.  All that fancy pants galavantin’ about the solar system, and … learnin’ stuff.  Can’t recall Bush threatening to cut the NASA budget.  He wanted to kill Hubble — the certitude of that “billions of years” talk shook his biblical bones — but at least he wanted to go to Mars or some crazy shit.  Now, NASA are talking to the Chinese about partnering up.  Change!   Not exactly the change I was imagining.

Obama’s glamour is wearing thin.  In fact, it’s threadbare.  The Chinese know it.  He’s a pushover.  In this, the investment cannot let go; he is so damned likable.

That is over.  Obama’s plain failure is obvious.  Unlike the election of 2000, 2008 was a known, vital cast, one the American public knew was important.  No one really thought or knew what the stakes would become in 2000 (except perhaps for those in on the fix).  Not so in 2008.  We all knew it.  The wreckage is everywhere.

The above is not an agenda bent on fixing any of it, but reeks of acquiescence and inertia. It demonstrates that Santos knew, two years ago, what we know now.

Mr. Obama, if this truly is your path for the United States, you have failed your mandate.  Not your Goldman Sachs mandate — clearly not — but the one entrusted to you by the American public, one that is desperate for a change of course.  One that still believed it was actually possible.  This is not that change of course.  Though admittedly persistent, as many a dead president may testify, this course is a dead end.  Instead of doing or even attempting to take on the necessary tasks at hand, you have folded across the board.  Cowardice in the face of potent adversaries? or were you in on this all along?

***
* Let’s just note the institutional proclivities here. Up to a $100 Billion per year into op tech to spy on Americans is unremarkable,  secret in fact, yet $80 Billion per year on health care for American citizens redounds to gross public spectacle, reason dragged through the shit strewn ditch, spat upon by clotpols with guns fully strapped.  Because health care for Americans, well, that’s some dangerous stuff, there.
—————–

Kenneth Anderson, an astronomer who has worked on a number of NASA projects, devotes his scientific training to observations and inferences about current affairs, politics and the media. He blogs at boneheadcompendium.com and can be reached at ken-AT-boneheadcompendium.com

Article Tools:  Print   Email

14 Responses for “Change And The Chosen Path”

  1. Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by ThePublicRecord: Change And The Chosen Path http://bit.ly/7XX54D

  2. Reader via Google says:

    The paragraph on Uzbekistan is patently false. The unnamed source was either ignorant of where Uzbekistan is or the author misquoted him big time.

    Read the following explanation from the blog Ghosts of Alexander from a real expert on Central Asia to get a better idea of what is going on there.

    http://easterncampaign.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/imaginary-jsoc-blackwater-ops-in-uzbekistan/

  3. ken anderson says:

    Unlike most Americans, I can assure you, Mr. Bleuer, that I and the readers of The Public Record are very well aware of the geographic location of Uzbekistan. Which is why I find this comment rather puzzling:

    “The paragraph on Uzbekistan is patently false. The unnamed source was either ignorant of where Uzbekistan is or the author misquoted him big time.”

    “Where Uzbekistan is” is right next to Afghanistan; they share a border. How exactly does this imply that covert operations could not be carried into Uzbekistan? A curious discontinuity between your “reasoning” and geography. Can you further explain how knowledge of the location of Uzbekistan would insist that covert ops could not be carried out there? Indeed, with all the new activity in the borders region of Afghanistan/Uzbekistan, it is not hard at all see how easily covert operations could be moved into Uzbekistan. This above statement remains utterly baffling.

    I did read your “explanation,” which is really not an explanation at all. Disappointingly so. Your putative knowledge of Central Asia hardly speaks to, nor can it, the operations conducted by JSOC and/or Blackwater. In fact, for someone claiming to be a “PhD” student, there was an expectation that a convincing argument would be presented to counter the reportage of someone many of us consider an expert on Blackwater and its operations around the world, Jeremy Scahill.

    But you don’t do that. In fact, you prove nothing, merely offer the depths of what appears to be an exercise in fifth-grade reasoning in order to demonstrate that Blackwater or JSOC could neither be in Uzbekistan nor conduct covert operations there. And then there this hilarious passage, which is, apparently, the argument for why Blackwater/JSOC could not be “at war” with Uzbekistan:

    Now get this, my “Wikipedia” sources tells me that the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan is not actually the government of Uzbekistan, but its sworn enemy. OMFG! That just blew my mind, bro! How many people know this? Shhh… Keep it on the down-low. People may be listening in. But if I read that right, attacking the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan is not the same as attacking the Government of Uzbekistan. It would actually help the GOU. So we’re not at war with O’zbekiston? Yay!

    I seriously hope argumentation in your thesis attains a higher level than this — much higher. According to you, the US cannot be at war with Uzbekistan because the IMU is not the government of Uzbekistan. Well, thank you for pointing that out. We were all confused here.

    There is this thing, perhaps you’ve heard of it, called International Law, which establishes another think, called sovereignty. Violations of that sovereignty vis-a-vis any foreign military is considered an Act of War. It matter not the target of the military operations, whether government or non-state actors. This is true unless this military presence has been granted permission by the host state, the UN Security Council resolves to conduct military operations there, or a declaration of war has been made by the military forces’ home state. But then, as a PhD student, you already knew that, right?

    Of course, a convenient way to get around the pleasantries of International Law is by mercenary, whose activities know no bounds, no borders, no law. Nonetheless, US boots and drones in Uzbekistan is a de facto act of war, regardless of what they are actually doing. That is what was being said in the quote you found so monstrously amusing.

    Indeed, one can more fully understand these covert operations within the context of the larger context of US foreign policy in the region. Recent visits by Clinton, et al, to the CAS and specifically to Uzbekistan indicate rising interest in the country as a both an energy source and as a pipeline transit route. The Central Asia-China gas pipeline (Turkemenistan-China pipeline), which passes through Uzbekistan, is being built right now. Pipelines, as you know, are notoriously easy for terrorists to blow up.

    You oddly claim that expertise of the IMU is needed in order to know whether JSOC or Blackwater could be operating there. How does that follow, exactly? In fact, understanding of the IMU is entirely irrelevant. I strongly doubt that JSOC or Blackwater have much understanding of the IMU either. And, what’s more, they don’t care, and for precisely that reason. This is not to say that this approach is correct, but the larger morass of Afghanistan should be enough to inform us that the US government, in general, knows next to nothing about the customs, tribulations, tribal affiliations, and grievances of Afghans and, by extension, Uzbek tribes as well. And, what is now plainly obvious, they don’t care.

    This blog entry is over.

    Dude, it was over before it began.

    One question remains: Do you actually have any understanding of the history of US covert operations, and what they have been used for? Because it sure doesn’t look like it.

  4. ken anderson says:

    There is another possibility here: you are just some paid Pentagon stooge posting up contrary commentary on articles/posts regarding this particular Scahill article. Because, we know they do that.

    Of course, the US military claims to offer “factual and well-cited response [that] is not factually erroneous, a rant or rage, bashing or negative in nature.”

    Obviously, this can’t be you.

  5. Reader from Google says:

    Ken, I did not mean to offend your personal sensibilities, but I am speaking from a point of view of someone who has lived in Uzbekistan and visited the other countries of the region. All I can say is if you lived there, or even visited each one of those countries, you would agree with me. You would agree that Uzbekistan would balk at having any kind of US activities inside it, because it is plenty capable of taking care of anything inside it. Plus, inside it is so peaceful, so different than Afghanistan, it’s like day and night. And, I think this paragraph about Uzbekistan Scahil is reporting is baseless. But I have no proof as he does not. It would be wildly unbelievable if he can come up with a video.

  6. Ryan says:

    I agree with this article almost entirely. I voted for Obama and while I was not naive enough to expect him to accomplish everything he talked about on the campaign I did expect the sentiment he displayed to be apparent in all of his policy decisions. That has turned out to be very far from the truth. With very few exceptions we appear to have elected a President that talks in public much like the man who campaigned last year, but then when it comes time to act reverts right back to the disturbing Bush/Cheney rationales that I absolutely hated. One need only look briefly at Obama’s use of the State Secrets clause and his endorsement of a 3-tiered justice system to get just a taste of what he actually believes despite all the rosy speeches and interviews he gives.

    He won the Nobel Peace Prize weeks before announcing he was sending more troops to Afghanistan. His second such escalation since taking office by the way. How does that promote peace?

    I would be able to handle the surge in Afghanistan if he were sticking to his campaign promises in other areas. To be honest I was expecting him to send more troops to Afghanistan because he said he would on the campaign trail. It is the couple hundred other things he promised that he apparently has no interest in achieving that keep me from getting behind him on this surge.

    I will not be voting for him again. Time to start looking at 3rd parties.

  7. Katie Mason Stevens says:

    The Nobel Prize wasn’t meant to truly honor President Obama. It was a way for those on the Nobel Committee to do their best to embarrass and coerce him into behaving as they want on climate change and foreign policy.

    He would have done best to reject it and them. It would have gotten him more respect even if you don’t agree with his decisions. At least he’d have shown some strength and stood up for what he really was planning to do.

    I was for Health Care Reform during the campaign because he talked about no mandates. Now we will have a mandate, one that will impose a burden upon some of the people this legislation claims to help.

    Because of the Recession I’m now self-employed which is good but in order to keep my client I’m making a little above minimum wage. I wouldn’t have made much more if I’d taken a temp assignment for an admin job. But in my current position I have a real opportunity to grow my services.

    I’m also making 1/3 my pre-Recession salary. To further the difficulty I’m what you’d call Rent Poor. Rent is 1/2 my monthly salary and it’s a very modest apartment at that.

    I have a loan to pay off and also pay some bills for my Mother (phone, clothing, magazine subscriptions) who lives in a Residence.

    At the end of the month I have no more than $50-100 left, and often that goes to cover my immediate needs or emergencies. I recently had to get a new stove, for example.

    Even with a subsidy I would not be able to afford $200-300 a month for the mandated coverage. Please see the December 1st entry to Speaker Pelosi’s blog, “The Gavel” for the latest CBO figures.

    There is nothing I’ve seen so far that transaltes into lower premiums.

    I am amazed at the naivete shown by Washington. We are being legislated to buy the products of a for profit, private company which will be subsidized by tax payer dollars.

    Isn’t this like a huge bailout to the health insurance industry?

    I’m quite sure Karen Ignagni of AHIP has had a very large hand in crafting the legislation as it evolved. It tilts too much in favor of the insurance industry.

    It seem to me like Big Pharma and the Health Insurance industry played nice, snickering behind the elected officials’ back. There always was a plan to keep inflating the prices of their goods and services so that by the time legislation took effect an individual policy will cost $10000 and a family policy $20000 a year.

    The industry is, after all, a profit driven one. The ultimate purpose is to increase that profit and deliver a dividend check to the shareholder. Why ever should it be any different.

    Ignagni even says the penalties should be higher.

    I am also appaled by the threats of jail time for failure to pay a penalty.

    I’ve also learned that in order to get a hardship waiver one must submit all one’s financial papers, expenses and details about the past year in order for the government to determine whether or not one is really in difficulty.

    I’m no longer in favor of this non-Reform. It’s doing nothing but making me sick. Not the “peace of mind” Speaker Pelosi says the legislationn will ensure all Americans.

    Not at all the hope and change President Obama led me to believe he’d usher in.

  8. ken anderson says:

    Mr. Bleuer,

    Now, that is a comment I can appreciate. I always think bringing personal and direct experience to the discussion is a plus. But I am unconvinced that most citizens — regardless the country — would simply have no idea that anything untoward was happening vis-a-vis US covert operations. And while have no doubt that Karimov’s regime is plenty capable of “taking care” of itself, we recently received perhaps some indication as to the sort of “missions” JSOC and Blackwater might be involved in Uzbekistan, and elsewhere.

    “Blackwater Guards Tied to Secret Raids by the CIA”

    “The raids against suspects occurred on an almost nightly basis during the height of the Iraqi insurgency from 2004 to 2006, with Blackwater personnel playing central roles in what company insiders called “snatch and grab” operations …”

    Of course, JSOC is not the CIA, but we know JSOC often performs parallel operations to that of the CIA, and the “snatch and grabs,” “extraordinary renditions,” or nominally “kidnappings,” and we know that Blackwater works with both the CIA and JSOC.

    It becomes apparent that, if Scahill’s sources are right, these JSOC/Blackwater missions in Uzbek territory could well lie along the “snatch and grab” operations scenario. In this way, certainly, generalized mayhem is not created — bombs do not go off — and the ops remain quiet and out of sight at scopes outside the local villages, etc., where the snatch took place.

    This is not hard to imagine. I think we can all recognize that most Americans had no idea (and have no idea to this day) that Blackwater was deployed on American soil post-Katrina, and probably will continue to be deployed on an “as needed” basis. And we will never hear a word about this, except possibly as an ex post facto exposition.

    Thanks again for your comments, Mr. Bleuer. I appreciate that you returned to offer a more reasonable and understandable point of view. We all wish the Uzbeks the best, and my concern about Uzbekistan does not lie with the Uzbeks, but with what many of us fear is a deliberate escalation and widening of the war into the surrounding states of Afghanistan on the part of the US military.

  9. ken anderson says:

    Ryan, Katie,

    Thank you both for your comments. Indeed, there appears to be growing swath of people who have watched Obama’s fall from “grace” and are none too pleased with the sight. Obviously, I am one of them, as are you both.

    As far as Katie’s comment:
    “The Nobel Prize wasn’t meant to truly honor President Obama. It was a way for those on the Nobel Committee to do their best to embarrass and coerce him into behaving as they want on climate change and foreign policy.”

    That may be. And if it was, it was an utter failure.

  10. ken anderson says:

    As follow-up, there almost no reason to doubt that the US military is operating in Uzbekistan. In August of this year, the US military and the Karimov regime signed a military “cooperation” agreement, replete with education and training.

    President of Uzbekistan Islam Karimov recently received General David Petraeus, the Commander of the US Central Command, at Oqsaroy residence in Tashkent. During Petraeus’ visit to the Central Asian republic, Uzbekistan and the US have inked an agreement to strengthen military cooperation between both the nations.

  11. sharon says:

    Is it possible that Carter and Craig were let go *because* they failed to close Gitmo? That’s certainly how I read it — these two guys, fine gentlemen both, took the fall for failing to succeed in their missions. That’s not shabby, it’s accountability — it sucks for people on the receiving end, but that’s they way it goes.

    Not that I blame them for failing — turned out to be harder than it sounded, no?

  12. ken anderson says:

    Sharon,

    Well, I suppose it is possible. But given the policy trajectory Obama has demonstrated everywhere else regarding detainees, as with his own nomination of Dawn Craig, he just switched gears, dumping his reformers, sometime in May.

    If you have not read the lengthy Greg Craig article, The Fall of Greg Craig, (TIME), you might find it interesting.

  13. Christian B says:

    Mr Anderson,

    I was just informed that I was engaged in a comment-thread debate here. However, that’s not me vanity-linking or replying above.

  14. ken anderson says:

    Huh. Interesting.

Leave a Reply

Article Tools:  Print   Email
Copyright © 2008 The Public Record. All rights reserved. Branding services provided by www.AndrewToschi.com Quantcast