<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Need Government Funded Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pubrecord.org/special-to-the-public-record/6851/need-government-funded-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pubrecord.org/special-to-the-public-record/6851/need-government-funded-media/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=need-government-funded-media</link>
	<description>Intrepid New Journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dobropet</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/special-to-the-public-record/6851/need-government-funded-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator>dobropet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=6851#comment-2012</guid>
		<description>I completely agree Jason, doesn&#039;t &quot;publicly funded&quot; encompass government subsidies? How would that not be control of the print media?

And, if I remember correctly, wasn&#039;t the &quot;climate gate scandal&quot; exposed by a blogger?

http://www.spectator.co.uk/print/politics/all/5749853/the-global-warming-guerrillas.thtml

And what did corporate media do? Turk 1-8---never mind, they bowed to political interests and scientific rhetoric that has been exposed for the lie that it was. I would dare to suggest that some, or atleast a few, of those journalists working for these firms gave into moral standards rather than demoralization of their work.

I would gather to say there is more here within this issue than has been addressed by the authors you cite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree Jason, doesn&#8217;t &#8220;publicly funded&#8221; encompass government subsidies? How would that not be control of the print media?</p>
<p>And, if I remember correctly, wasn&#8217;t the &#8220;climate gate scandal&#8221; exposed by a blogger?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spectator.co.uk/print/politics/all/5749853/the-global-warming-guerrillas.thtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.spectator.co.uk/print/politics/all/5749853/the-global-warming-guerrillas.thtml</a></p>
<p>And what did corporate media do? Turk 1-8&#8212;never mind, they bowed to political interests and scientific rhetoric that has been exposed for the lie that it was. I would dare to suggest that some, or atleast a few, of those journalists working for these firms gave into moral standards rather than demoralization of their work.</p>
<p>I would gather to say there is more here within this issue than has been addressed by the authors you cite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Buberel</title>
		<link>http://pubrecord.org/special-to-the-public-record/6851/need-government-funded-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Buberel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pubrecord.org/?p=6851#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, you lost all credibility when you wrote &quot;...will persuade anyone with basic reading skills of the above assertions&quot;. Nothing like insulting the reader in order to win them over!

And to claim that government funding would not lead to eventual governmental influence and ultimately, control seems too naive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, you lost all credibility when you wrote &#8220;&#8230;will persuade anyone with basic reading skills of the above assertions&#8221;. Nothing like insulting the reader in order to win them over!</p>
<p>And to claim that government funding would not lead to eventual governmental influence and ultimately, control seems too naive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

