Special to The Public Record

Unless Otherwise Directed…

Handout Faisal Shahzad was arrested in connection with the botched attempt to blow up a car in Times Square.

I’ve worked in journalism for 35 years. I did graduate study in journalism, I’ve worked as a daily newspaper reporter and I’ve freelanced magazine articles and newspaper op-eds. Now I blog.

I’ve learned that certain ideas are not permitted in the mainstream press. Well-paid gatekeepers might say these ideas are misguided, wrong or irresponsible, but that’s not really the reason. It’s because certain ideas are not in alignment with the middle-brow assumptions our mainstream press operates within. It also has to do with a commercial inclination for celebrity journalism and a fetish for score keeping over analysis.

Here’s a personal example. For three weeks, since the Times Square bombing attempt, I’ve been in a back-and-forth exchange with the op-ed editor of a major city newspaper over a 900-word piece focused on the motivations of would-be bomber Faisal Shahzad.

Over the years I’ve had numerous op-eds in this newspaper, most of them critical of the current wars and all leaning to the political left.

Based on remarks the editor emailed to me, I re-wrote the piece twice. Now I’m getting silence. It seems I have hit the wall of verboten ideas; I think he’s ashamed to tell me “no” outright.

Here’s the paragraphs that contain what I submit is an unacceptable idea for mainstream US minds:

There is no indication Shahzad calculated becoming a citizen to pull off a terrorist act. His decision to kill seems to have come later, a combination of his life coming apart and anger at US drone attacks in northwest Pakistan where he was raised.

Discussion of this case often assumes the interests of the Pakistan Taliban to attack America occurred outside history, that somehow the change in their attitude is not a result of our escalating drone attacks and our pressure on the Pakistani military to assault northwest Pakistan. It’s as if the United States is exempt from history and our actions don’t have consequences.

It’s exactly the same brand of denial that pushed 50 years of military and political intervention and oil exploitation in Saudi Arabia from the minds of Americans as to why 16 Saudis drove planes into our buildings on September 11th.”

The idea in these sentences – that a history of US military intervention is a prime motivation of “terrorist” attacks on us here and around the world — is effectively embargoed from mainstream discussion…

To read the of this story, please visit the new journalist-owned, collectively-run online newspaper ThisCantBeHappening.net.

John Grant, a contributor to thiscantbehappening.net, is a writer/photographer living just outside Philadelphia’s city limits. He has worked as a newspaper reporter and has published both fiction and non-fiction.

Article Tools:  Print   Email

3 Responses for “Unless Otherwise Directed…”

  1. dobropet says:

    This is the third article I’ve read viewing the botched NYC bombing as a difference in opinion.

    One of the articles (the first I read) claimed he had been radicalized in the middle east. The second claimed it was due in fact to the South Park episode depicting Muhammed as a bear (which I had given credence to since the vehicle was found in front of the agency that produces South Park, plus the fact that Trey and Matt pulled the following episodes depicting him). And now this, looking at the evidence could it have been a combination? Or, dare I say, radical Islam?

  2. treva says:

    I really like what you’re doing and I want to thank you for exposing truth on serious issues. We are very confused Americans.

  3. frankly says:

    well its obvious. youre an anti-semetic!

Leave a Reply

Article Tools:  Print   Email
Copyright © 2008 The Public Record. All rights reserved. Branding services provided by www.AndrewToschi.com Quantcast