http://zerzetzen.wikispaces.com

Both the Canadian and UK Governments are actively covering this up at the highest levels.

The torture used is sometimes called no touch torture. it was invented by the stasi to persecute dissidents and they called it zerzetsen. No touch or not, it poisons every part of a person’s life. Roderick Russell

SP Biloxi… Check out the Paul O’Neil “buried” 60 minutes interview…….
The White House was selling Iraqs OIL from DAY 1.. they had maps of the wells.. and fields.. See… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inyCkCvqRO0

Mike… You are REALLY onto them… The torture is part of the sideshow…too
Not ONLY to extract false information [Al Libi in Egypt] to get their OIL war… it was to intimidate, frighten opponents and control the flow of information….And to provide a distraction as the deadly seriuos business of destroying the evidence was put into action…. Where are the tapes of what the alleged perps said?? Destroyed?? Why??
Where are the Air Controllers tape of their control of 911 flights?? Where is the “plane’ and the remains that they “identified” at the pentagon..?? And then there is the anthrax “mystery’…….. So many mysteries, so little WILL

johnhkennedy….Yes… Only prosecutions get FACTS… We need WAY MORE facts.

Thank You TPR for the chance to put my ideas out….

KEEP ASKING ALL POLITICIANS AT ALL PUBLIC EVENTS

“WHY DO YOU SUPPORT TORTURE?” If they aren’t actively calling for enforcement of our Federal Torture Laws, They DO Support Torture.

SIGN THE PETITIONS
Demanding
both a Commission of Inquiry
and a Special Prosecutor
For All Their Crimes
at ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

http://ANGRYVOTERS.ORG

Only Prosecution Stops Torture!
Only Prosecution Stops Violations of Our Constitution and Rule Of Law.
.

1) The pre-9/11 conduct of torture program advocates has never been fully examined. For example we have never learned why Alec Station withheld from the FBI (from 1/00 through 8/01) the fact that two ID’ed al Qaeda operatives were in the US. Some of the same CIA officials recommended for a disciplinary panel by Helgerson in his 9/11 internal review were key advocates of the torture program.

2)FBI agent Soufan testified that legal FBI methods were working and that the CIA torture program was counterproductive. This is very important as we have been led to believe the torture was a last resort measure required when all legal interrogation methods failed. If the priority was not to attain solid intelligence then of course the legal FBI methods wouldn’t have worked. Torture would have been required for false confessions (i.e. linking al Qaeda to Iraq).

3)Scott Shane (NYT) wrote that the CIA interrogator who replaced Soufan 1)didn’t speak Arabic 2) had no counterterrorism experience 3)had no interrogation experience. This strongly suggests the CIA wasn’t interested in attaining reliable information.