Comments on: EXCLUSIVE: CIA Experiments on U.S. Soldiers Linked to Torture Program http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=research-torture-charges-human Intrepid New Journalism Wed, 23 May 2012 23:20:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Short Term Memory http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-38672 Short Term Memory Wed, 16 May 2012 20:26:44 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-38672 <strong>read more...</strong> [...]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, however, they are definitely worth checking out[...]... read more…

[...]just below, are some totally unrelated sites to ours, however, they are definitely worth checking out[...]…

]]> By: David Marshall http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-25104 David Marshall Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:46:45 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-25104 In 2011 U.S. Military Personnel still have NO, U.S. Constitution, Amendment 8, “experiments that were designed to harm” Rights? PLEASE HELP. Crowded prisons are in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s, Bill of Rights, Eighth Amendment no cruel and unusual punishments. This is the U.S. Supreme Court, Brown v. Plata (09-1233) May 23, 2011 decision. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) “...Article 7 - Freedom from Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.”, gives U.S. convicted rapists and murderers protection from experiments by the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights, Amendment 8. Under the ICCPR Article 7's “Basic Rights of Prisoners.” is, “Written policy and practice prohibit the use of inmates for medical...experiments.” and “Nonconsensual experimentation is illegal”! Nineteen (19) times cited is the U.S. Constitution plus its 8th Amendment’s no cruel and unusual punishment.[4] This is the 1992 U.S. Senate signed United Nation, ICCPR Article 7. Department of Defense (DOD) “military research” “experiments that were designed to harm” without Bill of Rights protection, were conducted on “hundreds of thousands” [2], under the ongoing secrecy cover of our ‘national interests’, e.g., WWII, Cold War, Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War, Iraq and Afghanistan. This is 1994 documented by the U.S. Senate and Government Accountability Office (GAO).[2 & 3] Also in 1994 the Court of Veterans Appeals (COVA) Chief Judge stated the related evidence restricting, "The court may not review the schedule of ratings for disabilities or the policies underlying the schedule."[5] Based on the U.S. Senate’s, “the last 50 years” back to 1944, it is now 67 years of no change in “underlying” policy, e.g., the17 years ago still ignored “..Feres Doctrine should not be applied...” without any mention of the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Amendment 8![2] The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1950 Feres Doctrine [8] was used to ignore the 8th Amendment in the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1987 Stanley case [6]. Its DOD non-consensual, “to harm” experiment was classified as just a continuing Feres Doctrine “incident to service” event! It was in direct disobedience of the DOD Secretary’s 1953 NO non-consensual experiments![7] Amendment 8 is not addressed in either of the Feres or Stanley Cases! For 67 years still not 8th Amendment addressed are the “military research” “experiments that were designed to harm”! [2] Doesn’t this mean the continuing use of deceived U.S. Service Personnel as guinea pigs in deliberate injury experiments? Shouldn’t U.S. Service Personnel and Veterans get back those Constitutional Amendment 8 Rights that they die for and convicted rapists and murderers keep? Please hold your members in the U.S. Congress accountable! The 2002 U.S. Senate Hearing [1] on the 1950 Feres Doctrine [8] is 127 pages of 19 Testimonials and Submissions for the Record that ignored Amendment 8, the U.S. Senate and GAO back to 1944 documented OVERSIGHTS. Starting on page 64 of the 2002 Senate Hearing PDF version, [1] the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE stated that in the 1950 U.S. Supreme Court’s Feres Doctrine decision [8], “The Court relied upon three principal reasons in coming to its decision: (1) The existence and availability of a separate, uniform, comprehensive, no-fault compensation scheme for injured military personnel;....”. Answering this issue is the in 2011 still ignored 1994 U.S. Senate Report’s [2] past and present, "III. Findings and conclusions", "K. DOD and DVA have repeatedly failed to provide information and medical followup to those who participate in military research..." and "N. Participation in military research is rarely included in military medical records, making it impossible to support a veteran’s claim for service-connected disabilities from military research.", i.e., the withheld needed for treatment but “experiments that were designed to harm” evidence. All of which the Court of Veterans Appeals “may not review”! Millions of service records were destroyed in a 1973 National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) fire, followed by Congress’s 1974 Privacy Act that censored experiment verifying witnesses from any surviving and future records. The U.S. Senate Report noted, “The Feres Doctrine should not be applied for military personnel who are harmed by inappropriate human experimentation when informed consent has not been given.” Then, “During the last 50 years, hundreds of thousands of military personnel” were subjected to “experiments that were designed to harm”, e.g., their reported biological and chemical agents, radiation exposure, hallucinogenic and investigational drugs, experimental vaccines and behavior modification projects. Not 2002 recognized was that many experiments were in direct disobedience of the DOD Secretary’s 1953 NO non-consensual experiments! [7] In the “three principal reasons” continuation, the Dept. of Justice reported the Supreme Court’s, “....(2) The effect upon military order, discipline, and effectiveness if service member were permitted to sue the government or each other; and, (3) The distinctly federal relationship between the government and members of its armed services, and the corresponding unfairness of permitting service-connected claims to be determined by nonuniform law.” [1], i.e., the “unfairness” of applying the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights, Amendment 8 to U.S. Citizens and Prisoners but NOT to U.S. Service Personnel? U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION? Overlooked by many in Congress is their Oath of Office to defend the U.S. Constitution, their “Pledge of Allegiance” “with liberty and justice for all" checks and balances function, their U.S. Constitution 8th Amendment protection of convicted rapists and murderers (but NOT U.S. Service Personnel) with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ignored, carved in stone over its entrance, “EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW”! In 2011 shouldn’t U.S. Service Personnel have the same U.S. Constitutional Rights that all other U.S. Citizens plus convicted rapists and murderers keep? REFERENCES: [1] “THE FERES DOCTRINE: AN EXAMINATION OF THIS MILITARY EXCEPTION TO THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT OCTOBER 8, 2002.” www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/pdf/107hrg/88833.pdf [2] December 8, 1994 REPORT 103-97 "Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans' Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century." Hearings Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, 103rd Congress 2nd Session. [3] GAO September 28, 1994 “Human Experimentation Overview on Co1d War Era Programs” T-NSIAD-94-266 archive.gao.gov/t2pbat2/152601.pdf [4] U.S. State Dept., "U.S. Report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights July 1994, Article 7 - Freedom from Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.”Index of "1994 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" Index of "Treaties and Legal Issues" || Electronic Research Collections Index || ERC Homepage [5] "STATE OF COURT, CHIEF JUDGE FRANK Q. NEBEKER, STATE OF THE COURT, FOR PRESENTATION TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS THIRD JUDICIAL CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 17-18, 1994 [6] U.S. SUPREME COURT, JUNE 25, 1987, U.S. V. STANLEY , 107 S. CT.. 3054 (VOLUME 483 U.S., SECTION 669, PAGES 699 TO 710). http://supreme.justia.com/ us/483/669/ case.html [7] Pages. 343-345: "The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code; Human Rights in Human Experimentation” George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin (N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1992). [8] Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 146 (1950). In 2011 U.S. Military Personnel still have NO, U.S. Constitution, Amendment 8, “experiments that were designed to harm” Rights?

PLEASE HELP. Crowded prisons are in violation of the U.S. Constitution’s, Bill of Rights, Eighth Amendment no cruel and unusual punishments. This is the U.S. Supreme Court, Brown v. Plata (09-1233) May 23, 2011 decision. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) “…Article 7 – Freedom from Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.”, gives U.S. convicted rapists and murderers protection from experiments by the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights, Amendment 8. Under the ICCPR Article 7′s “Basic Rights of Prisoners.” is, “Written policy and practice prohibit the use of inmates for medical…experiments.” and “Nonconsensual experimentation is illegal”! Nineteen (19) times cited is the U.S. Constitution plus its 8th Amendment’s no cruel and unusual punishment.[4] This is the 1992 U.S. Senate signed United Nation, ICCPR Article 7. Department of Defense (DOD) “military research” “experiments that were designed to harm” without Bill of Rights protection, were conducted on “hundreds of thousands” [2], under the ongoing secrecy cover of our ‘national interests’, e.g., WWII, Cold War, Korea, Vietnam, Gulf War, Iraq and Afghanistan. This is 1994 documented by the U.S. Senate and Government Accountability Office (GAO).[2 & 3] Also in 1994 the Court of Veterans Appeals (COVA) Chief Judge stated the related evidence restricting, “The court may not review the schedule of ratings for disabilities or the policies underlying the schedule.”[5] Based on the U.S. Senate’s, “the last 50 years” back to 1944, it is now 67 years of no change in “underlying” policy, e.g., the17 years ago still ignored “..Feres Doctrine should not be applied…” without any mention of the U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Amendment 8![2] The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1950 Feres Doctrine [8] was used to ignore the 8th Amendment in the U.S. Supreme Court’s 1987 Stanley case [6]. Its DOD non-consensual, “to harm” experiment was classified as just a continuing Feres Doctrine “incident to service” event! It was in direct disobedience of the DOD Secretary’s 1953 NO non-consensual experiments![7] Amendment 8 is not addressed in either of the Feres or Stanley Cases! For 67 years still not 8th Amendment addressed are the “military research” “experiments that were designed to harm”! [2] Doesn’t this mean the continuing use of deceived U.S. Service Personnel as guinea pigs in deliberate injury experiments? Shouldn’t U.S. Service Personnel and Veterans get back those Constitutional Amendment 8 Rights that they die for and convicted rapists and murderers keep? Please hold your members in the U.S. Congress accountable!

The 2002 U.S. Senate Hearing [1] on the 1950 Feres Doctrine [8] is 127 pages of 19 Testimonials and Submissions for the Record that ignored Amendment 8, the U.S. Senate and GAO back to 1944 documented OVERSIGHTS. Starting on page 64 of the 2002 Senate Hearing PDF version, [1] the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE stated that in the 1950 U.S. Supreme Court’s Feres Doctrine decision [8], “The Court relied upon three principal reasons in coming to its decision: (1) The existence and availability of a separate, uniform, comprehensive, no-fault compensation scheme for injured military personnel;….”. Answering this issue is the in 2011 still ignored 1994 U.S. Senate Report’s [2] past and present, “III. Findings and conclusions”, “K. DOD and DVA have repeatedly failed to provide information and medical followup to those who participate in military research…” and “N. Participation in military research is rarely included in military medical records, making it impossible to support a veteran’s claim for service-connected disabilities from military research.”, i.e., the withheld needed for treatment but “experiments that were designed to harm” evidence. All of which the Court of Veterans Appeals “may not review”! Millions of service records were destroyed in a 1973 National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) fire, followed by Congress’s 1974 Privacy Act that censored experiment verifying witnesses from any surviving and future records. The U.S. Senate Report noted, “The Feres Doctrine should not be applied for military personnel who are harmed by inappropriate human experimentation when informed consent has not been given.” Then, “During the last 50 years, hundreds of thousands of military personnel” were subjected to “experiments that were designed to harm”, e.g., their reported biological and chemical agents, radiation exposure, hallucinogenic and investigational drugs, experimental vaccines and behavior modification projects. Not 2002 recognized was that many experiments were in direct disobedience of the DOD Secretary’s 1953 NO non-consensual experiments! [7]

In the “three principal reasons” continuation, the Dept. of Justice reported the Supreme Court’s, “….(2) The effect upon military order, discipline, and effectiveness if service member were permitted to sue the government or each other; and, (3) The distinctly federal relationship between the government and members of its armed services, and the corresponding unfairness of permitting service-connected claims to be determined by nonuniform law.” [1], i.e., the “unfairness” of applying the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights, Amendment 8 to U.S. Citizens and Prisoners but NOT to U.S. Service Personnel?

U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION? Overlooked by many in Congress is their Oath of Office to defend the U.S. Constitution, their “Pledge of Allegiance” “with liberty and justice for all” checks and balances function, their U.S. Constitution 8th Amendment protection of convicted rapists and murderers (but NOT U.S. Service Personnel) with the U.S. Supreme Court’s ignored, carved in stone over its entrance, “EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER LAW”!

In 2011 shouldn’t U.S. Service Personnel have the same U.S. Constitutional Rights that all other U.S. Citizens plus convicted rapists and murderers keep?

REFERENCES:

[1] “THE FERES DOCTRINE: AN EXAMINATION OF THIS MILITARY EXCEPTION TO THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT OCTOBER 8, 2002.” http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/pdf/107hrg/88833.pdf

[2] December 8, 1994 REPORT 103-97 “Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans’ Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century.” Hearings Before the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, 103rd Congress 2nd Session.

[3] GAO September 28, 1994 “Human Experimentation Overview on Co1d War Era Programs” T-NSIAD-94-266 archive.gao.gov/t2pbat2/152601.pdf

[4] U.S. State Dept., “U.S. Report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights July 1994, Article 7 – Freedom from Torture, or Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.”Index of “1994 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” Index of “Treaties and Legal Issues” || Electronic Research Collections Index || ERC Homepage

[5] “STATE OF COURT, CHIEF JUDGE FRANK Q. NEBEKER, STATE OF THE COURT, FOR PRESENTATION TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS THIRD JUDICIAL CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 17-18, 1994

[6] U.S. SUPREME COURT, JUNE 25, 1987, U.S. V. STANLEY , 107 S. CT.. 3054 (VOLUME 483 U.S., SECTION 669, PAGES 699 TO 710). http://supreme.justia.com/ us/483/669/ case.html

[7] Pages. 343-345: “The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code; Human Rights in Human Experimentation” George J. Annas and Michael A. Grodin (N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 1992).

[8] Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 146 (1950).

]]> By: Clea http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-2875 Clea Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:08:46 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-2875 One more comment - I haven't been discounted as delusional, perhaps due to the fact that I kept evidence of some of the crimes. One more comment – I haven’t been discounted as delusional, perhaps due to the fact that I kept evidence of some of the crimes.

]]> By: Clea http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-2874 Clea Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:05:52 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-2874 I'm a middle-aged woman who was preparing to defend her dissertation in Anthropology when I was blitzed by something similar to what has been described above. Constant computer intrusion, intellectual property theft, death threats, road harassment, threats to hurt my minor daughter, attacks with some kind of DEW apparently, car tampering and vandalism, extreme cyberbullying and cyberstalking etc, and I also have gone to both federal and law enforcement agencies. The harassers then posting things along the lines of blackmail, but since I haven't actually committed a crime, it would be difficult for them to show that short of framing me (and yes, I collected evidence for the threats and the hacking, including threats to torture me with electronic harassment). Upon discovering (on my hacked internet that is also full of disinformation) that there are other victims of this type of crime, I realized that I have had this problem for quite some time: strange phone calls for years, apartment entry, slander at school, workplace mobbing (that I outlived since I'm a pretty reliable worker), car windows smashed out, etc. In fact, I can link this problem to events in childhod and was even mysteriously volunteered for an EEG at age 15. The amount of social engineering and harassment that I have endured over the years points to MK Ultra behavior modification type projects. Like the poster above, I also happen to have a good CV and had an excellent grade point average in graduate school. Unlike the poster, I'm not blaming the russian mafia for this problem, not am I subscribing to any radical political theories about it's origins. Because of the likelihood that my problem is along the lines of non consensual human experimentation, I'm inclined to think that the problems of torture/interrogation at Guantanamo are related. Because a lot of the harassment has been along the lines of psychological harassment, it will also be my assumption that persons in academia were involved in the construction and monitoring of this program. We need help and at the moment, we are not getting that from the justice system. I can't prove what technology has been used against me, but I can certainly point to several manuals that may have been used in orchestrating the harassment. And I can show that these threats were made. It is my feeling that even joining groups for "mind control victims" (a better term might be "behavioral modification" since that is what the manuals refer to) is also part of the non consensual experimentation, because whatever we say about the situation, the expression of our feelings about religion or politics etc. are likely being documented. (Maybe our responses to the trauma can be what is called "clean" interrogation.) I didn't sign up for the trauma conditioning program and I would like someone to have the guts to put an end to this. This type of harassment needs *full* exposure and prosecution under the highest law possible. Perhaps an investigation into Guantanamo and the involvement of academics in this unethical and illegal activity will open the secret door to where all the black ops money is going, As I write this, I continue to be hacked and even at the public library my harassers have access to my internet, indicating that it is not "the russian mafia" who is behind this. I can't even be in contact with my professors and I can show that I've had email interference. While I don't discount identity theft as a motivation (after all, I've had documents stolen also), it appears that non consensual experimentation into trauma conditioning, behavior modification, torture and interrogation are more likely to be the culprits. I’m a middle-aged woman who was preparing to defend her dissertation in Anthropology when I was blitzed by something similar to what has been described above. Constant computer intrusion, intellectual property theft, death threats, road harassment, threats to hurt my minor daughter, attacks with some kind of DEW apparently, car tampering and vandalism, extreme cyberbullying and cyberstalking etc, and I also have gone to both federal and law enforcement agencies. The harassers then posting things along the lines of blackmail, but since I haven’t actually committed a crime, it would be difficult for them to show that short of framing me (and yes, I collected evidence for the threats and the hacking, including threats to torture me with electronic harassment).

Upon discovering (on my hacked internet that is also full of disinformation) that there are other victims of this type of crime, I realized that I have had this problem for quite some time: strange phone calls for years, apartment entry, slander at school, workplace mobbing (that I outlived since I’m a pretty reliable worker), car windows smashed out, etc. In fact, I can link this problem to events in childhod and was even mysteriously volunteered for an EEG at age 15.

The amount of social engineering and harassment that I have endured over the years points to MK Ultra behavior modification type projects. Like the poster above, I also happen to have a good CV and had an excellent grade point average in graduate school. Unlike the poster, I’m not blaming the russian mafia for this problem, not am I subscribing to any radical political theories about it’s origins.

Because of the likelihood that my problem is along the lines of non consensual human experimentation, I’m inclined to think that the problems of torture/interrogation at Guantanamo are related. Because a lot of the harassment has been along the lines of psychological harassment, it will also be my assumption that persons in academia were involved in the construction and monitoring of this program.

We need help and at the moment, we are not getting that from the justice system. I can’t prove what technology has been used against me, but I can certainly point to several manuals that may have been used in orchestrating the harassment. And I can show that these threats were made.

It is my feeling that even joining groups for “mind control victims” (a better term might be “behavioral modification” since that is what the manuals refer to) is also part of the non consensual experimentation, because whatever we say about the situation, the expression of our feelings about religion or politics etc. are likely being documented. (Maybe our responses to the trauma can be what is called “clean” interrogation.)

I didn’t sign up for the trauma conditioning program and I would like someone to have the guts to put an end to this. This type of harassment needs *full* exposure and prosecution under the highest law possible. Perhaps an investigation into Guantanamo and the involvement of academics in this unethical and illegal activity will open the secret door to where all the black ops money is going,

As I write this, I continue to be hacked and even at the public library my harassers have access to my internet, indicating that it is not “the russian mafia” who is behind this. I can’t even be in contact with my professors and I can show that I’ve had email interference. While I don’t discount identity theft as a motivation (after all, I’ve had documents stolen also), it appears that non consensual experimentation into trauma conditioning, behavior modification, torture and interrogation are more likely to be the culprits.

]]> By: Linda Gore http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-1409 Linda Gore Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:50:22 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-1409 charles morgan says: September 22, 2009 at 12:58 pm "Our research on PTSD .... began in the 1990s .." Behavioral Cognitive Science Teams comprised of members of the JRPA, USSF, APA, FBI et al couldn't have successfully protected the criminal arses of all the psychopaths who raped and sodomized American babies enrolled in preschools on or near US Military bases during George H.W. Bush's terms as CIA Director, US Vice President, and US President, BY, contributing to the incarceration, debilitation, and death of their crime victims, without having access to a wide body of research on inducing abreactions a/k/a PTSD. Behavioral Cognitive Science Teams comprised of members of the JRPA, USSF, APA, and FBI couldn't have successfully protected the criminal arses of themselves and all the criminals and psychotics they trained and/or paid to assist them in degrading and dominating cyberspace, BY, contributing to the incarceration, debilitation and/or death of Americans who sought to use the WWW as a marketplace of ideas, without having had access to a wide body of research on inducing abreactions a/k/a PTSD. The ultimate objective of all government sponsored "PTSD research" is the acquisition of knowledge wrt abreaction induction. charles morgan says:
September 22, 2009 at 12:58 pm

“Our research on PTSD …. began in the 1990s ..”

Behavioral Cognitive Science Teams comprised of members of the JRPA, USSF, APA, FBI et al couldn’t have successfully protected the criminal arses of all the psychopaths who raped and sodomized American babies enrolled in preschools on or near US Military bases during George H.W. Bush’s terms as CIA Director, US Vice President, and US President, BY, contributing to the incarceration, debilitation, and death of their crime victims, without having access to a wide body of research on inducing abreactions a/k/a PTSD.

Behavioral Cognitive Science Teams comprised of members of the JRPA, USSF, APA, and FBI couldn’t have successfully protected the criminal arses of themselves and all the criminals and psychotics they trained and/or paid to assist them in degrading and dominating cyberspace, BY, contributing to the incarceration, debilitation and/or death of Americans who sought to use the WWW as a marketplace of ideas, without having had access to a wide body of research on inducing abreactions a/k/a PTSD.

The ultimate objective of all government sponsored “PTSD research” is the acquisition of knowledge wrt abreaction induction.

]]> By: Stan J. Caterbone http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-1227 Stan J. Caterbone Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:34:53 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-1227 October 1, 2009 Dear Mr. Kaye, I am a victim and target of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, and member of the Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance Organization, (www.FreedomFCHS.com) or FFCHS. We all thank you for bringing these issues to light. I am also a member of an outreach committee for FFCHS and we are actively seeking high profile persons to be spokesman for our organization. Would you be interested? The following document titled HAARP, The United States Government, Mind Control and The Advanced Media Group describes in some detail my case. It can be found at: http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/haarp-the-united-states-government-and-advanced-media-group-september-23-20092.pdf Stan J. Caterbone Advanced Media Group Member Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance, FFCHS www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com October 1, 2009

Dear Mr. Kaye,

I am a victim and target of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, and member of the Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance Organization, (www.FreedomFCHS.com) or FFCHS. We all thank you for bringing these issues to light.

I am also a member of an outreach committee for FFCHS and we are actively seeking high profile persons to be spokesman for our organization. Would you be interested?

The following document titled HAARP, The United States Government, Mind Control and The Advanced Media Group describes in some detail my case. It can be found at:

http://advancedmediagroup.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/haarp-the-united-states-government-and-advanced-media-group-september-23-20092.pdf

Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
Member Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance, FFCHS
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com

]]> By: charles morgan http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-1060 charles morgan Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:58:39 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-1060 I am disappointed to see that Jeffrey Kaye continues to be both inaccurate and misleading. The research conducted by our research team at the National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder is not, and never has been, conducted for any other purpose than to help us understand the pathophysiology of stress disorders and we might better help in the treatment of veterans. Our research on PTSD and our studies of stress in healthy soldiers began in the 1990s - long before 2001 and the Bush Administration's policies. We will continue to investigate how we might better help individuals who suffer from trauma related disorders. I am disappointed to see that Jeffrey Kaye continues to be both inaccurate and misleading. The research conducted by our research team at the National Center for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder is not, and never has been, conducted for any other purpose than to help us understand the pathophysiology of stress disorders and we might better help in the treatment of veterans. Our research on PTSD and our studies of stress in healthy soldiers began in the 1990s – long before 2001 and the Bush Administration’s policies. We will continue to investigate how we might better help individuals who suffer from trauma related disorders.

]]> By: Findlay http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-571 Findlay Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:21:00 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-571 Experiments are still going on, and here is how it went for us, and our renters are also unwillingly being hit with radiation. It is part of an IDENTITY THEFT crime that is happening to people who have good resumes with International experience, and also to people who have land, or an inheritance that can be taken. I strongly believe that the Russian Mafia is to blame. 1. A woman, middle aged, opens a trading account, and, BAM the computer is hacked and somehow they use the computer to send out emails, or maybe child pornography. They IMMEDIATELY report this crime to the FBI, so and investigation is opened. 2. Before the victim knows what is going on, she is discredited to the police. 3. The police call the Citizen Police to have her stalked (tagged). Phones, emails, and surveillance is in place. 4. Every attempt is made to harass, frame, blackmail, and cause the person to make a mistake. 5. The person reports the hacking to the police, the death threats, and other horrible threats that were made, but the police have been told that the person is delusional, and she is discounted. 6. A contract is gained through the DOD for a radiation study, or some other study, and the scientist moves in next to the person. 7. In our case, the scientist is burning us with lasers, hitting us with radiation at night, and participating in overt harassment, such as running around the house with all the lights on in his underwear at night, or checking his mail in his underwear while we are on the porch. 8. We are harassed with deadly radiation until we either move, or die. We are no longer credible to the police, so no claim we make will be taken seriously. 9. The person with the good resume they want will either be killed, sickened, or discredited at work, so they lost their job. Meanwhile, the Russian Mafia has already applied for jobs with the good resume, and our address. 10. A fake poison pen letter is sent to the husband, the wife is blackmailed, and the family is all mind controlled to hate the mother, and call her crazy. She knows what is going on, but she is the only one, and nobody will believe that she is being stalked. The family is destroyed, killed, or sickened. 11. Mission accomplished, Identity Theft! Experiments are still going on, and here is how it went for us, and our renters are also unwillingly being hit with radiation. It is part of an IDENTITY THEFT crime that is happening to people who have good resumes with International experience, and also to people who have land, or an inheritance that can be taken. I strongly believe that the Russian Mafia is to blame.
1. A woman, middle aged, opens a trading account, and, BAM the computer is hacked and somehow they use the computer to send out emails, or maybe child pornography. They IMMEDIATELY report this crime to the FBI, so and investigation is opened.
2. Before the victim knows what is going on, she is discredited to the police.
3. The police call the Citizen Police to have her stalked (tagged). Phones, emails, and surveillance is in place.
4. Every attempt is made to harass, frame, blackmail, and cause the person to make a mistake.
5. The person reports the hacking to the police, the death threats, and other horrible threats that were made, but the police have been told that the person is delusional, and she is discounted.
6. A contract is gained through the DOD for a radiation study, or some other study, and the scientist moves in next to the person.
7. In our case, the scientist is burning us with lasers, hitting us with radiation at night, and participating in overt harassment, such as running around the house with all the lights on in his underwear at night, or checking his mail in his underwear while we are on the porch.
8. We are harassed with deadly radiation until we either move, or die. We are no longer credible to the police, so no claim we make will be taken seriously.
9. The person with the good resume they want will either be killed, sickened, or discredited at work, so they lost their job. Meanwhile, the Russian Mafia has already applied for jobs with the good resume, and our address.
10. A fake poison pen letter is sent to the husband, the wife is blackmailed, and the family is all mind controlled to hate the mother, and call her crazy. She knows what is going on, but she is the only one, and nobody will believe that she is being stalked. The family is destroyed, killed, or sickened.
11. Mission accomplished, Identity Theft!

]]> By: Jeffrey Kaye http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-568 Jeffrey Kaye Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:54:14 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-568 I am gratified to see a strong response to this article, as the issues are of paramount importance. I do want to add for readers that since posting this article, other quotes by Dr. Morgan have been brought to my attention that call into question his feelings about using SERE as an experimental foundation for interrogations. I will address these in an upcoming follow-up to this article. But here is one quote, by Dr. Morgan, to give you a feel for what I'm talking about. I've emphasized a key sentence by surrounding it with asterisks: "Another line of research at SERE involves a low-tech methodology to find the identity of an undercover operative that some members of the group of students are attempting to conceal. Preliminary analysis suggests that this new technique is not only effective at uncovering the information suspects are trying to hide but also capable of detecting which subjects possess the sensitive information. The next phase is designed to assess whether the technique can be used to find a cell of "terrorists" hidden in a group of suspects. ****The SERE training environment affords the military services the opportunity to collaborate with various other government agencies in exploring old and new techniques in gathering human intelligence."**** See http://books.google.com/books?id=rytCzdXGgXkC&pg=PA252&lpg=PA252&dq=%22The+SERE+platform+offers+a+unique+opportunity+to+evaluate+old+and+new+assessment+techniques+under+conditions+that+are+more+realistic+than+traditional+laboratories.%22&source=bl&ots=S93BwlfFtQ&sig=-QVvU_SsXMYGhbz_T_iygPY1rqs&hl=en&ei=8FipSvzCG5LasQP85tHtBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1 I am gratified to see a strong response to this article, as the issues are of paramount importance. I do want to add for readers that since posting this article, other quotes by Dr. Morgan have been brought to my attention that call into question his feelings about using SERE as an experimental foundation for interrogations. I will address these in an upcoming follow-up to this article.

But here is one quote, by Dr. Morgan, to give you a feel for what I’m talking about. I’ve emphasized a key sentence by surrounding it with asterisks:

“Another line of research at SERE involves a low-tech methodology to find the identity of an undercover operative that some members of the group of students are attempting to conceal. Preliminary analysis suggests that this new technique is not only effective at uncovering the information suspects are trying to hide but also capable of detecting which subjects possess the sensitive information. The next phase is designed to assess whether the technique can be used to find a cell of “terrorists” hidden in a group of suspects. ****The SERE training environment affords the military services the opportunity to collaborate with various other government agencies in exploring old and new techniques in gathering human intelligence.”****

See http://books.google.com/books?id=rytCzdXGgXkC&pg=PA252&lpg=PA252&dq=%22The+SERE+platform+offers+a+unique+opportunity+to+evaluate+old+and+new+assessment+techniques+under+conditions+that+are+more+realistic+than+traditional+laboratories.%22&source=bl&ots=S93BwlfFtQ&sig=-QVvU_SsXMYGhbz_T_iygPY1rqs&hl=en&ei=8FipSvzCG5LasQP85tHtBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1

]]> By: Jesse Hemingway http://pubrecord.org/torture/4607/research-torture-charges-human/comment-page-1/#comment-565 Jesse Hemingway Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:26:52 +0000 http://pubrecord.org/?p=4607#comment-565 E The creation of SERE training is an indictment on its own; SERE is the proof that the United States Government would have intentions and be operating out side the scope of the Geneva Conventions. All SERE training really was is an effort to clear Eisenhower’s conscious as covert activate and illegal military action escalated. For the Bush Administration to publicly state “that we use the same torture methods as used in SERE training so it is not torture” proves their criminal guilt on that statement alone. xecutive Order 10631--Code of Conduct for members of the Armed Forces of the United States Source: The provisions of Executive Order 10631 of Aug. 17, 1955, appear at 20 FR 6057, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 266, unless otherwise noted. By virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States, and as Commander in Chief of the armed forces of the United States, I hereby prescribe the Code of Conduct for Members of the Armed Forces of the United States which is attached to this order and hereby made a part thereof. All members of the Armed Forces of the United States are expected to measure up to the standards embodied in this Code of Conduct while in combat or in captivity. To ensure achievement of these standards, members of the armed forces liable to capture shall be provided with specific training and instruction designed to better equip them to counter and withstand all enemy efforts against them, and shall be fully instructed as to the behavior and obligations expected of them during combat or captivity. [Second paragraph amended by EO 12633 of Mar. 28, 1988, 53 FR 10355, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 561] The Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard except when it is serving as part of the Navy) shall take such action as is deemed necessary to implement this order and to disseminate and make the said Code known to all members of the armed forces of the United States. [Third paragraph amended by EO 11382 of Nov. 28, 1967, 32 FR 16247, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 691] Code of Conduct for Members of the United States Armed Forces I I am an American, fighting in the forces which guard my country and our way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense. [Article I amended by EO 12633 of Mar. 28, 1988, 53 FR 10355, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 561] II I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist. [Article II amended by EO 12633 of Mar. 28, 1988, 53 FR 10355, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 561] III If I am captured I will continue to resist by all means available. I will make every effort to escape and aid others to escape. I will accept neither parole nor special favors from the enemy. IV If I become a prisoner of war, I will keep faith with my fellow prisoners. I will give no information or take part in any action which might be harmful to my comrades. If I am senior, I will take command. If not, I will obey the lawful orders of those appointed over me and will back them up in every way. V When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give name, rank, service number and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause. [Article V amended by EO 12017 of Nov. 3, 1977, 42 FR 57941, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 152] VI I will never forget that I am an American, fighting for freedom, responsible for my actions, and dedicated to the principles which made my country free. I will trust in my God and in the United States of America. [Article VI amended by EO 12633 of Mar. 28, 1988, 53 FR 10355, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 561] E
The creation of SERE training is an indictment on its own; SERE is the proof that the United States Government would have intentions and be operating out side the scope of the Geneva Conventions. All SERE training really was is an effort to clear Eisenhower’s conscious as covert activate and illegal military action escalated. For the Bush Administration to publicly state “that we use the same torture methods as used in SERE training so it is not torture” proves their criminal guilt on that statement alone.

xecutive Order 10631–Code of Conduct for members of the Armed Forces of the United States

Source: The provisions of Executive Order 10631 of Aug. 17, 1955, appear at 20 FR 6057, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 266, unless otherwise noted.

By virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States, and as Commander in Chief of the armed forces of the United States, I hereby prescribe the Code of Conduct for Members of the Armed Forces of the United States which is attached to this order and hereby made a part thereof.

All members of the Armed Forces of the United States are expected to measure up to the standards embodied in this Code of Conduct while in combat or in captivity. To ensure achievement of these standards, members of the armed forces liable to capture shall be provided with specific training and instruction designed to better equip them to counter and withstand all enemy efforts against them, and shall be fully instructed as to the behavior and obligations expected of them during combat or captivity.

[Second paragraph amended by EO 12633 of Mar. 28, 1988, 53 FR 10355, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 561]

The Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary of Transportation with respect to the Coast Guard except when it is serving as part of the Navy) shall take such action as is deemed necessary to implement this order and to disseminate and make the said Code known to all members of the armed forces of the United States.

[Third paragraph amended by EO 11382 of Nov. 28, 1967, 32 FR 16247, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 691]

Code of Conduct for Members of the United States Armed Forces

I

I am an American, fighting in the forces which guard my country and our way of life. I am prepared to give my life in their defense.

[Article I amended by EO 12633 of Mar. 28, 1988, 53 FR 10355, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 561]

II

I will never surrender of my own free will. If in command, I will never surrender the members of my command while they still have the means to resist.

[Article II amended by EO 12633 of Mar. 28, 1988, 53 FR 10355, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 561]

III

If I am captured I will continue to resist by all means available. I will make every effort to escape and aid others to escape. I will accept neither parole nor special favors from the enemy.

IV

If I become a prisoner of war, I will keep faith with my fellow prisoners. I will give no information or take part in any action which might be harmful to my comrades. If I am senior, I will take command. If not, I will obey the lawful orders of those appointed over me and will back them up in every way.

V

When questioned, should I become a prisoner of war, I am required to give name, rank, service number and date of birth. I will evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause.

[Article V amended by EO 12017 of Nov. 3, 1977, 42 FR 57941, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p. 152]

VI

I will never forget that I am an American, fighting for freedom, responsible for my actions, and dedicated to the principles which made my country free. I will trust in my God and in the United States of America.

[Article VI amended by EO 12633 of Mar. 28, 1988, 53 FR 10355, 3 CFR, 1988 Comp., p. 561]

]]>